<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>???의 군함 이야기: Battlecruiser의-역어에-대해에 달린 최근 댓글/트랙백 목록</title>
		<link>http://danew.net/warship/</link>
		<description>1850-1950 사이의 군함들 이야기.</description>
		<language>ko</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:18:20 +0900</pubDate>
		<generator>Textcube 1.7.2 : Risoluto</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>gforce님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment291</link>
			<description>그러고나서 문득 든 생각. &#039;순양(Cruise)하지 않는 전함은 없으므로 전투순양함이 적합하다&#039;

...</description>
			<author>(gforce)</author>
			<guid>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment291</guid>
			<comments>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:13:07 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>???님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment292</link>
			<description>어디에서 나온 이야긴지는 몰라도, 좀 웃기는 논리로군요. 그럼 모든 군함은 다 싸우니까 전함이랍니까? 전함도 어뢰정을 쫓기 위해 부포를 달았으니 구축함이 되겠군요 :) 어디에 초점을 맞추었는지가 중요한겁니다.</description>
			<author>(???)</author>
			<guid>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment292</guid>
			<comments>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:44:19 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gforce님의 댓글</title>
			<link>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment290</link>
			<description>어디에서는 굉장히 간단하게 답을 내렸더랬죠. &#039;전투를 하지 않는 순양함은 없으므로 순양전함이 적합하다&#039;

...뭐랄까, 묘하게 설득력있는 말이었습니다-_-;;</description>
			<author>(gforce)</author>
			<guid>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment290</guid>
			<comments>http://danew.net/warship/entry/Battlecruiser%EC%9D%98-%EC%97%AD%EC%96%B4%EC%97%90-%EB%8C%80%ED%95%B4#comment</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:11:59 +0900</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
